[openbeos] Re: app_server compatibility?
- From: "Mikael Jansson" <tic_khr@xxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:15:30 GMT
Adi Oanca <adioanca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Mikael Jansson wrote:
> >>(between us: don't you think that if we would've had a functional
> >>BButton, we showed it to the world?)
> >>
> >
> > Of course, but I wouldn't expect a stub to crash. Even if it
> > doesn't
> > do anything, the draw_32_to_32() function isn't a part of BButton,
> > right?
>
> Nope. As you see it's a part of Blitter class.
>
> What's a stub? A stub is a simple BWindow class.
> BButton requires a lot of functionality.
>
Okay, I assumed that whatever functions not implemented would be nops,
and not crash-ops. :)
--
Mikael Jansson
http://mikael.jansson.be
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: app_server compatibility?
- From: DarkWyrm
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: app_server compatibility?
- From: Adi Oanca
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] app_server compatibility?
- » [openbeos] Re: app_server compatibility?
- » [openbeos] Re: app_server compatibility?
- » [openbeos] Re: app_server compatibility?
- » [openbeos] Re: app_server compatibility?
- » [openbeos] Re: app_server compatibility?
- [openbeos] Re: app_server compatibility?
- From: DarkWyrm
- [openbeos] Re: app_server compatibility?
- From: Adi Oanca