[openbeos] Re: adding Tracker in bootscript
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:39:55 +0100 CET
Shaka <shaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is it too premature to request that we include Tracker in the
> bootscript? I have been running it for weeks now and it's not only
Current builds are mostly targeted at developers, not users, and for
most of the tests at least I am doing, Tracker is not yet needed. I
probably wouldn't mind if I weren't mainly using Qemu for testing,
though :-)
I'd also like to squash down some more bugs before adding Tracker.
> stable, it's exciting to watch it boot! Adding "mountvolume -all" as
> well to the boot script makes it even more fun! (assuming the new BFS
> will not corrupt old BFS partitions, and for me, so far so good)
I wouldn't do that yet, at least :)
Mounting itself shouldn't do any harm, but as soon as you start writing
on those drives, there's definitely a chance they'll got corrupted.
Bye,
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeos] adding Tracker in bootscript
- From: Shaka
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] adding Tracker in bootscript
- » [openbeos] Re: adding Tracker in bootscript
- » [openbeos] Re: adding Tracker in bootscript
- [openbeos] adding Tracker in bootscript
- From: Shaka