[openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:16:20 +0100 CET
"Andrew Bachmann" <shatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I agree that warnings are a good thing but sometimes they just
> don't serve a useful purpose. We are already going to get the
> warning when a function is implicitly defined due to a missing
> prototype and I think that's enough.
It does serve a useful purpose, it's just that you seem to have
forgotten about visibility issues.
Bye,
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- From: Andrew Bachmann
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- From: Andrew Bachmann