[openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- From: burton666@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 31 Dec 2003 07:55:49 -0000
>There's a function called control_hook. It is defined in a prototype prior
>to
>its use in device_hooks. Since control_hook actually
>performs a number of different behaviors, depending on the
>argument, each was broken out into a separate function, which was
>defined before control_hook. No other functions are going to call
>these functions, so there's really no point to define prototypes for
>them in the header or anywhere else.
What about defining them as static ? That would remove the warning, and if they
aren't used anywhere else, it's ok to do that.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Spazio ILLIMITATO per la tua Email, Scanner Antivirus,
Antispam, Backup e POP3. Prova la nuova Email di superEva:
http://webmail.supereva.it/
-----------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- From: Andrew Bachmann
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- From: Andrew Bachmann