[openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:18:11 +0100 CET
"Andrew Bachmann" <shatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This seems like the winning suggestion to me. Just another wacky C
> thing.
> This is why I don't do drivers I guess. (heh)
That's not wacky, that's a useful feature. It's even something that's
missing (a bug in the specs as I would see it) in C++; you cannot
define a class only locally - it's always visible from the outside
until you strip the symbols manually.
Bye,
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- From: Andrew Bachmann
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- From: Andrew Bachmann
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- » [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- From: Andrew Bachmann
- [openbeos] Re: -Wmissing-prototypes
- From: Andrew Bachmann