Patrik Gissberg wrote: > > And then, why this single ridiculously high resolution? Why not just > > something > > like "at least 1920x1080", if possible in different aspect ratios? > The idea is to simplify it by only requesting one, common resolution. > The selected format is in between 4:3 (the narrowest usualy in use) > and 16:9 (the widest) and is large enough for all modern monitors. By > having an original in this format gives us the possibility to > downscale and use the same wallpaper both on 4:3 and 16:9 monitors, > regardless of its resolution. See the illustrations in one of my > earlier posts. How about letting people submit a resolution suitable for web consumption plus an info at which maximum resolution the image is available, if the original content is pixel based? Vector content would be marked respectively, so would content from which a pixel format can be generated at any resolution (but which isn't vector content). For pixel content a minimum available resolution to enter the contest should probably be defined. CU, Ingo