[haiku] Re: Updated website pages online for peer review
- From: "Jonas Sundström" <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 18:17:59 +0200 CEST
"Jorge G. Mare" <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Your message has the following problems IMO:
>
> * It is too generic and lacking in specifics...
>
> * ...and therefore lacks differentiation (which is essential).
I vote for differentiation by madness! ;)
Enough of this poetic serenity!
> * It makes claims that Haiku will not be able to meet for the
> foreseeable future due to lack of maturity/features/applications...
>
> * ...and can therefore create false expectations that could be
> difficult to manage and eventually backfire.
Yeah, I know. I wish we could make those wild claims though.
Self-fulfilling prophecies never hurt anyone. (At least not
the positive ones.)
Jokes aside, I realize it's not the responsible think to do.
/Jonas.
Other related posts:
