[openbeos] Re: Two small fixes for the BString tests
- From: Daniel Furrer <daniel_furrer@xxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 12:46:38 +0200
Stefano Ceccherini wrote:
<> Thanks for your work, though I am not sure about applying this patch.
It's true that that option isn't supported, but we should test the two
cases (with true and false) neverthless, to be sure that they both
behave correctly, moreover the fact that it's not supported for now
doesn't mean it won't be supported in the future :)
It would not be nice if someone called Truncate(10, false) and bad
thing happened, and we couldn't notice because we don't have a test
for it.
Oh, I'm sorry, I just noticed that this is a post R5 feature..
I was using Zeta, which I think doesn't support that flag, so it gave me
a linker error and I wrongly assumed, that this flag doesn't exist at
all (since I didn't find it in the Zeta BString headers).
Actually I wanted to fix some of the errors during compilation, but as
it turns out, this is
Not A Good Idea on Zeta, since there are some small differences which
cause this errors.
(like the removal of this flag, or the change of some argument from
char* to constr char* [see BMessage:GetInfo()])
So it liiks like I have to find another activity for my free time, being
bored and wanting to do something for Haiku ;)
cya,
Daniel Furrer
Other related posts:
