Stephan Aßmus <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Since the worst thing that happens are not so nicely "downsampled" > > icons, I think we could actually consider it for R1. > What I meant with my initial response was that the API allows to > support 32 > bit icons without breaking existing apps. If the bitmap was not > provided by > the caller, than I would be much more cautious about doing this > change. But > being it as it is, we could change this and all that could happen is > potentially uglier icons in some apps for which we don't have source. True, that's the situation - it would all have dependent on how the other API had been documented :-) > The real workload of course is drawing quite a huge number of nice > icons. > We don't only need a talented person, but also a motivated person who > does > this for free. Yes, but we can't get around this anyway. Bye, Axel.