[openbeos] Re: Trac SVN revisions
- From: "Waldemar Kornewald" <wkornewald@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:53:08 +0100
On 11/29/06, Jérôme Duval <korli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I thought a "Fixed in revision(s)" field would be good enough.
It would be useful if one wants to generate a release notes document
(with impacting revisions) like this :
http://struts.apache.org/1.2.9/userGuide/release-notes.html
What do you think ?
Hmm, just in case you wondered about my last reply:
Adding the field is a matter of adding two lines to the Trac
configuration file, so this is not the problem. I'm just trying to
keep the UI as simple as possible (and sensible). If you really think
it's highly important to have that field I can add it, but I doubt
that it's needed if we can use milestones to achieve basically the
same (writing release notes).
Bye,
Waldemar Kornewald
- References:
- [openbeos] Trac SVN revisions
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [openbeos] Re: Trac SVN revisions
- From: Jérôme Duval
- [openbeos] Re: Trac SVN revisions
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
- [openbeos] Re: Trac SVN revisions
- From: Jérôme Duval
Other related posts:
I thought a "Fixed in revision(s)" field would be good enough. It would be useful if one wants to generate a release notes document (with impacting revisions) like this : http://struts.apache.org/1.2.9/userGuide/release-notes.html What do you think ?
- [openbeos] Trac SVN revisions
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [openbeos] Re: Trac SVN revisions
- From: Jérôme Duval
- [openbeos] Re: Trac SVN revisions
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
- [openbeos] Re: Trac SVN revisions
- From: Jérôme Duval