[openbeos] Re: Trac SVN revisions
- From: "Waldemar Kornewald" <wkornewald@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:28:14 +0100
Hi Jérôme,
On 11/29/06, Jérôme Duval <korli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2006/11/29, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> thanks to Waldemar, Trac now identifies references to SVN revisions in
> comments if they follow the usual style, that is, for example r1234.
> So, if you refer to SVN revisions in Trac, please always write it that
> way if the change is important for the bug, ie. "Fixed in r1234" is
> then much more helpful than "Fixed in rev 1234" or "Fixed in 1234" :-)
Does this mean I can search bugs based on a SVN revision ?
It is definitely useful for generating a changelog.
No, unfortunately not. But I also don't know how you imagined this to
work. Doesn't CIA already do what you want?
Bye,
Waldemar Kornewald
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: Trac SVN revisions
- From: Jérôme Duval
- References:
- [openbeos] Trac SVN revisions
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [openbeos] Re: Trac SVN revisions
- From: Jérôme Duval
Other related posts:
2006/11/29, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > thanks to Waldemar, Trac now identifies references to SVN revisions in > comments if they follow the usual style, that is, for example r1234. > So, if you refer to SVN revisions in Trac, please always write it that > way if the change is important for the bug, ie. "Fixed in r1234" is > then much more helpful than "Fixed in rev 1234" or "Fixed in 1234" :-) Does this mean I can search bugs based on a SVN revision ? It is definitely useful for generating a changelog.
- [openbeos] Re: Trac SVN revisions
- From: Jérôme Duval
- [openbeos] Trac SVN revisions
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [openbeos] Re: Trac SVN revisions
- From: Jérôme Duval