[openbeos] Re: The Wiki

On 9/30/06, Waldemar Kornewald <wkornew@xxxxxxx> wrote: 

On 9/30/06, Jorge G. Mare (a.k.a. Koki) <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think there should be maintainers for each area that oversee the
> informational pages and works/coordinates with the contributors to make
> sure the content is accurate and up to date. The "go change it if you
> don't like it" method will just open the door to constant changes with
> no end in sight...

This may be the right method for end-user content, but I developers
should be able to just change stuff in RFCs, "implementation details",
and tutorials. You can't apply the same method to both. And I think
it's important for productivity to have incomplete development
content, too.

> Also, don't think comments are necessary for anything other than RFCs
> and blog entries.

If we don't need comments for news articles we should use the "page"
content type for end-user content, from now on. Developers should
stick with "article".



The author/admin/moderator can simply turn off comments per entry - that way
some news articles can be open to comments if desired...

It is the other
> articles that are not finished that I am referring to.

Our website is obviously not finished, yet. Would you like to become
responsible for finishing at least the articles which are
marcom-related?


Articles that are not finished can simply remain in the "content queue" only
visible to site moderators/admins until someone wants to finish them, no?

Other related posts: