[openbeos] Re: Take it easy... (was : Robustness)
- From: "unlyrn" <unlyrn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 03:23:41 NZST (+1200)
> Well, that's right, and that's assured: if something like this
> happens,
> you won't loose your data. That's why I've written the "recover"
> tool.
>
> > Next time someone says something that "gets on your nerves", don't
> > take it to heart - because remember, they're here for exactly the
> > same
> > reason as you; because they want OpenBeOS to work, as soon and as
> > well as possible.
>
> I can at least speak for me that I think you've misinterpreted me - I
> just have a slightly different POV than Guillaume.
oops, I was kind of afraid of this when I posted that message :)
I didn't really mean to single anyone out - just that the on-list
environment
as a whole could be a bit more constructive - for example
"if you think its that easy, do it yourself"
could be replaced by
"perhaps this could be something for GE?"
Anyway, I know noone is really trying to attack anyone else, I just
have a 'thing' about making the environment as productivity-conducive
as possible...
David Shipman
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: Take it easy... (was : Robustness)
- From: David Reid
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Take it easy... (was : Robustness)
- » [openbeos] Re: Take it easy... (was : Robustness)
- » [openbeos] Re: Take it easy... (was : Robustness)
- » [openbeos] Re: Take it easy... (was : Robustness)
- » [openbeos] Re: Take it easy... (was : Robustness)
- » [openbeos] Re: Take it easy... (was : Robustness)
- » [openbeos] Re: Take it easy... (was : Robustness)
- » [openbeos] Re: Take it easy... (was : Robustness)
- » [openbeos] Re: Take it easy... (was : Robustness)
- [openbeos] Re: Take it easy... (was : Robustness)
- From: David Reid