[openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- From: François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 16:31:24 +0200 (CEST)
En réponse à Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Probably 90-95% of the Storage Kit API as described in the BeBook is
> implemented via POSIX calls. The remaining 10-5% requires support from
>
> our own kernel. We'll also rewrite the backend of everything we
What system calls did it need already ?
I had once to guess some, I put them in:
http://wiki.bebits.com/page/UndocumentedSyscalls
François.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- References:
- [openbeos] Status of the Kits
- From: Mark A Johnson
- [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- From: Tyler Dauwalder
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [openbeos] Status of the Kits
- From: Mark A Johnson
- [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- From: Tyler Dauwalder