[openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- From: Tyler Dauwalder <tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 01:15:19 -0700
On 2003-04-07 at 19:54:11 [-0700], Mark A Johnson wrote:
> Just wondering what the "true" status of the kits is. Seeing as how
> the
> Storage Kit mailing list seems to be have a lot activity lately, as
> well
> as some others.
> So what is the true status?
Well, I can speak for us (Storage) at least. :-)
Probably 90-95% of the Storage Kit API as described in the BeBook is
implemented via POSIX calls. The remaining 10-5% requires support from
our own kernel. We'll also rewrite the backend of everything we
currently have to call directly into the kernel instead of using POSIX
calls when the time comes. We're still marked late alpha because we're
not yet technically feature complete (which irritates Daniel to no
end, which I rather enjoy ;-).
Right now we're working on the Disk Device API, which is a replacement
for the private API used by OpenTracker, DriveSetup, and maybe others
to get information about the various volumes/partitions on the
system's storage devices. And while we're at it we're adding some
stuff into the partition management framework to make it relatively
easy for filesystems/partitioning systems to support partition
resizing, moving, defragmenting, repairing, etc. (and to make it easy
for us to generically provide access to such services in our
DriveSetup replacement).
And while I'm thinking of it, what ever happened to the guy doing the
status updates in every other Newsletter? Anyone else want to tackle
that job if he doesn't raise his hand? I, at least, thought that was a
good idea...
-Tyler
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- From: François Revol
- References:
- [openbeos] Status of the Kits
- From: Mark A Johnson
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- » [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- [openbeos] Re: Status of the Kits
- From: François Revol
- [openbeos] Status of the Kits
- From: Mark A Johnson