[openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- From: Charlie Clark <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:15:38 +0100
On 2002-11-26 at 01:01:48 [+0100], openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Anyway I think the R5 zbeos handles parameter itself (it's responsible
> for the 'boot menu' for example), it currently doesn't accept parameters
> from outside I think...
>
> Btw zbeos is still somewhat strange... in R4 it could be loaded as a
> Linux kernel from LILO (just like another vmlinuz), not it can't in R5...
> I suppose it's because it begins with a bootsector.
I seem to recall that zbeos was written to avoid GPL issues around the
previous loader.
Charlie
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- From: Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler
- [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- From: François Revol
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- » [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- From: Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler
- [openbeos] Re: Stage 1 Bootloader
- From: François Revol