[openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Ramshankar <v.ramshankar@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:28:37 +0200
IMHO we could preserve ZETA apps with sources as they can quite easily
ported to haiku. Many apps just are r5 + locale kit. Some others that
use Zeta interface classes can be altered with a little bit of effort.
Regards,
Ram.
On 12-Oct-08, at 11:07 AM, "Stephan Assmus" <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote:
Von: Schrijvers Luc <Begasus@xxxxxxxxx>
I am also trying to go with Haiku as much as I can, as both
R5
and ZETA
have no future anymore ... but I still keep in mind that
there
are still
quite a number of people around using those 2 OS's.
Yes but Haikuware is centered on Haiku not R5 or Zeta.
K but why host R5 files then?
I thought that much would be clear... because Haiku is aiming to be
R5 compatible.
It wasn't Karl's decision that Haiku would be R5 compatible but not
ZETA compatible. At the time this decision was made by the Haiku
developers, ZETA was still alive and a moving target. Haiku R1 is
specifically aiming to reimplement a fixed target. ZETA is not
moving any more, but I am sure most people don't want to hold up the
release of Haiku R1 for making it ZETA compatible as well.
Furthermore, some stuff was implemented in ZETA that Haiku
developers disagreed with on a technical merit, like for example the
Local Kit. So I guess that we don't want to add more support for API
that we would like to implement in a different way in post-R1
releases of Haiku. There is already enough of that just by
implementing all the R5 APIs. I hope you understand.
Best regards,
-Stephan
- References:
- [openbeos] Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Dennis d'Entremont
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Stephan Assmus
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Arnold
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - . Meanwhile .
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Zenja Solaja
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cyan
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - . Meanwhile .
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Ryan Leavengood
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - . Meanwhile .
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cyan
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Gabriele Biffi
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Gabriele Biffi
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cian Duffy
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Matt Madia
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cyan
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Stephan Assmus
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Ramshankar
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Richie Nyhus
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Stephan Assmus
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Matt Madia
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cyan
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Stephan Assmus
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Matt Madia
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Urias McCullough
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - scott mc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cyan
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
Von: Schrijvers Luc <Begasus@xxxxxxxxx>I am also trying to go with Haiku as much as I can, as both R5and ZETAhave no future anymore ... but I still keep in mind that thereare still quite a number of people around using those 2 OS's. Yes but Haikuware is centered on Haiku not R5 or Zeta.K but why host R5 files then?
I thought that much would be clear... because Haiku is aiming to be R5 compatible.
It wasn't Karl's decision that Haiku would be R5 compatible but not ZETA compatible. At the time this decision was made by the Haiku developers, ZETA was still alive and a moving target. Haiku R1 is specifically aiming to reimplement a fixed target. ZETA is not moving any more, but I am sure most people don't want to hold up the release of Haiku R1 for making it ZETA compatible as well. Furthermore, some stuff was implemented in ZETA that Haiku developers disagreed with on a technical merit, like for example the Local Kit. So I guess that we don't want to add more support for API that we would like to implement in a different way in post-R1 releases of Haiku. There is already enough of that just by implementing all the R5 APIs. I hope you understand.
Best regards, -Stephan
- [openbeos] Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Dennis d'Entremont
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Stephan Assmus