[openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc <Begasus@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:00:22 +0200
On za, 2008-10-11 at 17:46 -0300, Dennis d'Entremont wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Schrijvers Luc <Begasus@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> On za, 2008-10-11 at 15:59 -0400, Karl vom Dorff wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Schrijvers Luc
> <Begasus@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > On za, 2008-10-11 at 13:56 -0400, Karl vom Dorff
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Oliver Ruiz
> Dorantes
> > > <oliver.ruiz.dorantes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Amazing work Karl,
> > >
> > >
> > > I am sure many of us had this idea in
> mind. In fact
> > I worked
> > > in some zoho formularies which people
> could submit
> > wanted
> > > applications and other could post
> something like a
> > url mirror.
> > > To "save" the application. Maybe this can
> be added
> > in
> > > Haikuware somehow Karl?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Not sure I understand what you mean... I want to
> try to get
> > away from
> > > people submitting their own mirrors and links to
> files. If
> > everything
> > > is all in one place, even if it goes down, it
> would be a lot
> > easier to
> > > retrieve than if files are scattered all over the
> web.
> > >
> > > Some Comments:
> > >
> > > - I hope in your SPIDER-WEB manual job you
> also
> > retrieved all
> > > possible sources. Even if the app is zeta
> only or is
> > old, the
> > > application can be ported and updated
> somewhere in
> > time.
> > >
> > >
> > > I didn't. I didn't download or add Zeta apps
> because Zeta is
> > dead.
> >
> >
> > I can't get it why you have to remove the ZETA apps?
> ZETA
> > dead ... you
> > are right there ... it has no future and is not
> developped ...
> > but that
> > goes for R5 too, are you removing R5 downloads also
> then?
> > Your reasons for not adding them don't add up ...
> >
> > It's purely logical. Haiku is meant to be binary compatible
> with BeOS
> > R5 NOT Zeta. Therefore Zeta applications are dead and have
> no future
> > (many requiring libzeta).
> >
>
I agree with Karl's reasoning on this. If there are ports that work on
Haiku then they could be included.
There is no mention of that anyware ...
qoute:
"I didn't. I didn't download or add Zeta apps because Zeta is dead."
Again ... you did! Freeciv is not running on R5, offialy on ZETA only
(but should run on R5 BONE also - never checked here). So far for
checking ...
> Haiku compiled apps wont even run in R5 nor ZETA, ZETA
> compiled apps
> (when not linked against libzeta) can run on R5, Haiku and
> ZETA ...
> Furthermore ... one of the things like the network is probably
> more
> compatible with ZETA then it is with R5 ...
>
> where is the problem there?
> >
> >
> > Another thing I'm having a bit of a problem with is
> the fact
> > that you
> > host files on haikuware that are activaly being
> > maintained/ported by
> > others, you are using screenshots that you copy'd
> from the
> > original
> > place etc.
> >
> > Sure, I don't have time to take 2000+ screenshots. It should
> look the
> > same way on BeOS as it does on Haiku if the application is
> to be
> > binary compatible, that's why I used any screenshots that
> were already
> > available.
> >
>
> I'm not even that upset about the screenshots as I am about
> the fact
> that you host files that are hosted on the porters site
> themselves.
> Most people know that I'm doing ports for BeOS/ZETA/Haiku .. I
> try not
> to make any differance when I'm compiling .. but sometimes it
> just takes
> ZETA to be able to compile the thing.
> I am also trying to go with Haiku as much as I can, as both R5
> and ZETA
> have no future anymore ... but I still keep in mind that there
> are still
> quite a number of people around using those 2 OS's.
>
> Yes but Haikuware is centered on Haiku not R5 or Zeta.
>
K but why host R5 files then?
>
>
> You can host the files in case of a website going down, but
> further then
> that it's good policy to link to the other hosting pages.
> The tuxpaint port is also hosted on Bill's own page ... the
> port I made
> is linked to that one so he can also check what files are
> downloaded and
> wich os's are still interesting for him (he asked me for the
> port to put
> up there).
> >
> >
> > Don't get me wrong .. the idea behind it all is a
> good one ..
> > but you
> > should've asked around a bit 'before' you added
> BeBits
> > contents over.
> > Some of the ports are even older on haikuware then
> the actual
> > release at
> > the moment on BeBits and the original port (freeciv
> for one).
> >
> > True, but very few. I started the project 8 months ago. In
> that time
> > some of the applications that I already submitted, may have
> been
> > updated in the meantime (i.e FireFox, Thunderbid). I'll have
> to review
> > this. Help is welcome, thanks for noting that application.
> >
>
> It wasn't hard to notice ... it is one of the ports I am
> active in in
> doing the ports and submitting patches back to their repo ...
> >
> So you host the download for Firefox, Thunderbird etc also?
> Did you even
> get in touch with the developers ... maybe they have a
> counting system
> or something to check the downloads for those files? What if
> the
> download for those files stop when everyone is using yours
> (even though
> a newer is online?). A guy could loose interest when there is
> no
> download for the stuff he is doing ...
>
> There's nothing stopping someone from taking one of these files and
> putting it up on BeBits or anywhere else so what does it matter if
> it's on Haikuware?
They have been put up on BeBits by the maintainers ... it's not the same
as downloading them and hosting them on another place ...
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > > Also, I didn't download sources. There are very
> few sources
> > > available. I thought long and hard about this one.
> I don't
> > want
> > > Haikuware to become a repository for source code.
> It would
> > demand too
> > > much I think for the way the website would be
> managed, and
> > OSDrawer
> > > already does a good job in this respect.
>
>
> That is indeed something I agree on .. hosting sources is
> greatly done
> by OSDrawer and haikuports at the moment ...
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dennis d'Entremont
> IT Professional CNA, MCP, A+, ITIL
> LinkedIn Profile - http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennisdentremont
> http://www.techalpha.net - Tech Alpha Computer Forums
> http://epcsolutions.ca - EasyPC Solutions
> http://eComStation.ca - Your Canadian Source for eCS and OS/2
> Software!
> http://Haikuware.com - Software for Haiku
> http://Haiku-OS.org - Haiku Operating System
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Dennis d'Entremont
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Stephan Assmus
- References:
- [openbeos] Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Dennis d'Entremont
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Arnold
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - . Meanwhile .
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Zenja Solaja
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cyan
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - . Meanwhile .
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Ryan Leavengood
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - . Meanwhile .
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cyan
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Gabriele Biffi
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Gabriele Biffi
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cian Duffy
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Matt Madia
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cyan
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Stephan Assmus
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Ramshankar
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Richie Nyhus
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Stephan Assmus
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Matt Madia
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cyan
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Stephan Assmus
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Matt Madia
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Urias McCullough
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - scott mc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cyan
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Dennis d'Entremont
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Stephan Assmus
- [openbeos] Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Dennis d'Entremont