[openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: "Karl vom Dorff" <karl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:59:03 -0400
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Schrijvers Luc <Begasus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On za, 2008-10-11 at 13:56 -0400, Karl vom Dorff wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
> > <oliver.ruiz.dorantes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Amazing work Karl,
> >
> >
> > I am sure many of us had this idea in mind. In fact I worked
> > in some zoho formularies which people could submit wanted
> > applications and other could post something like a url mirror.
> > To "save" the application. Maybe this can be added in
> > Haikuware somehow Karl?
> >
> >
> >
> > Not sure I understand what you mean... I want to try to get away from
> > people submitting their own mirrors and links to files. If everything
> > is all in one place, even if it goes down, it would be a lot easier to
> > retrieve than if files are scattered all over the web.
> >
> > Some Comments:
> >
> > - I hope in your SPIDER-WEB manual job you also retrieved all
> > possible sources. Even if the app is zeta only or is old, the
> > application can be ported and updated somewhere in time.
> >
> >
> > I didn't. I didn't download or add Zeta apps because Zeta is dead.
>
> I can't get it why you have to remove the ZETA apps? ZETA dead ... you
> are right there ... it has no future and is not developped ... but that
> goes for R5 too, are you removing R5 downloads also then?
> Your reasons for not adding them don't add up ...
It's purely logical. Haiku is meant to be binary compatible with BeOS R5 *
NOT* Zeta. Therefore Zeta applications are dead and have no future (many
requiring libzeta).
>
>
> Another thing I'm having a bit of a problem with is the fact that you
> host files on haikuware that are activaly being maintained/ported by
> others, you are using screenshots that you copy'd from the original
> place etc.
Sure, I don't have time to take 2000+ screenshots. It should look the same
way on BeOS as it does on Haiku if the application is to be binary
compatible, that's why I used any screenshots that were already available.
>
>
> Don't get me wrong .. the idea behind it all is a good one .. but you
> should've asked around a bit 'before' you added BeBits contents over.
> Some of the ports are even older on haikuware then the actual release at
> the moment on BeBits and the original port (freeciv for one).
True, but very few. I started the project 8 months ago. In that time some of
the applications that I already submitted, may have been updated in the
meantime (i.e FireFox, Thunderbid). I'll have to review this. Help is
welcome, thanks for noting that application.
>
> > Also, I didn't download sources. There are very few sources
> > available. I thought long and hard about this one. I don't want
> > Haikuware to become a repository for source code. It would demand too
> > much I think for the way the website would be managed, and OSDrawer
> > already does a good job in this respect. I looked at download.com,
> > VersionTracker, and several other big software websites; none of them
> > host sources.
> >
> > Sources are easy enough to find though. If they did exist, that meant
> > the software existed either on BeBits or the developer's homepage. I
> > still have the links posted on Haikuware to every author's website
> > that submitted their website with the software to BeBits.
> >
> > - The list and this anouncement must be public. The list in
> > plan txt(as requested) might help to search in our personal
> > entire archive. I might be able to do something automatic with
> > that saving in cvs might to most of the work. In my company
> > they are excel genious. And then a easy script bash script if
> > the a given archive path, constains somethe that is present in
> > that TXt file. As apps are getting recovered they could be
> > marked as it is and, i guess seeing this motivates people to
> > submit their files.
> >
> >
> >
> > I tried to make the list public here... Meanwhile made an easy list
> > here:
> >
> > http://www.xs4all.nl/~rrvvww/haikuwareABC.txt<http://www.xs4all.nl/%7Errvvww/haikuwareABC.txt>
> >
> > But the easiest way would be for me to invite you to the GoogleDoc,
> > that way, as a collaborator we all have access to the same file, and
> > can edit the file, i.e delete missing files off of the spreadsheet
> > once they're found.
> >
> > - How do we make you arrive the files? I just have a webdav
> > account in gmx which i could share but others? anyone with a
> > ftp to be able to drop the files?
> >
> >
> >
> > Anyone with a Haikuware account can upload missing files via the
> > online web interface...
> >
> > http://www.haikuware.com/upload
> >
> > Alternatively, I've opened an anonymous FTP folder. Just ftp to
> > haikuware.com and drop anything you may have in the incoming folder
> > (500 mb quota).
> >
> > Proposal: declare something like a "beshare sharing week"
> > where all comunity shares its archive. Therefore Karl and
> > other individuals could complete the "Target app database"
> >
> >
> >
> > Excellent idea!
> >
> > - An App its not safe with only the binary, at the time Haiku
> > switches to gcc4 that app would be old, and lost as could not
> > be used anymore. So now might be a good chance to beg for
> > opensourcing, submit binary and src, to ensure the app is
> > alive forever.
> >
> > Vamos!!
> >
> > 2008/10/11 Schrijvers Luc <Begasus@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > Is BeBits going down?!
> >
> > On vr, 2008-10-10 at 14:59 -0400, Karl vom Dorff
> > wrote:
> > > Dear Community,
> > >
> > > It's probably no surprise to many of you (as you see
> > the number of
> > > files on Haikuware increase) that I've been spending
> > the last while
> > > auditing BeBits.
> > >
> > > I think it's important to have a software base ready
> > for when Haiku's
> > > ready, and if users have to deal with the vast
> > amount of missing
> > > software at BeBits where ~35% (conservative
> > estimate) of the files are
> > > missing, they will surely get frustrated! Some may
> > argue, why bother?
> > > The software is old! To them I would say - old
> > software doesn't
> > > necessarily equate to bad software... Also, imagine
> > if BeBits were
> > > gone tomorrow. That would be a great loss.
> > >
> > > To make a long story short, here's what I've been
> > doing:
> > >
> > > * downloading all available files. When there
> > was missing
> > > software, I would check against the file
> > name at: a) BeShare
> > > b) Archive.org c) Google d) Check the
> > Talkback comments for
> > > links. In short, if the missing files were
> > available somewhere
> > > on the net, they have to be hiding pretty
> > good...
> > > * importing the files, descriptions, dates,
> > icons, etc. Adding
> > > archived links to author homepages if they
> > disappeared, etc.
> > > * centralizing all the files on one server
> > (later to be mirrored
> > > in Europe and Asia) so that the infamous
> > BeBits 'missing
> > > file/dead link' never happens again.
> > > * linking files only to one category. BeBits
> > is confusing and
> > > misleading because files are listed in
> > multiple categories
> > > (artificially inflating the file counts in
> > each category. e.g
> > > total file count listed on their frontpage
> > when adding all
> > > together = 6500, actual files = 3535). So
> > when you're browsing
> > > software, you don't know whether you've
> > already passed by the
> > > file you're looking at or not therefore
> > wasting time. Not to
> > > mention wasting time finding a link that
> > works or visiting
> > > unwelcomed porn sites hehe.
> > > * removed Zeta software.
> > >
> > > I'm 90% complete the task, and will be spending the
> > next 2-3 weeks
> > > finishing. BeBits lists 3535 'files' on their
> > website, of which I
> > > estimate 35% are gone (= 2298 actual files). Today I
> > uploaded the
> > > 2222nd file to Haikuware, meaning very shortly,
> > Haikuware may be the
> > > largest (but not most popular) online provider of
> > BeOS (and Haiku if
> > > Haiku R1 achieves binary compatibilty) software (and
> > maybe retro
> > > software in general)... But that's not really the
> > point.
> > >
> > > The point is, I'd like to salvage as much BeOS
> > software as possible.
> > > I'd like to ask the community to contribute any
> > missing files (that
> > > I'm sure they have on CDs in their basements) my
> > way, so I can fill
> > > the missing gaps. I've tried to keep a record
> > (sometimes GoogleDocs
> > > crashed on me) of the missing files, and for the
> > most part, should be
> > > pretty complete. You can view the documents here (in
> > XLS, ODF):
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://www.haikuware.com/downloads/registered/haikuware.zip
> > >
> > > Although I would hope most people see this endeavour
> > as a good thing,
> > > I can appreciate that some developers may not like
> > their software
> > > hosted at Haikuware. Please contact me, and I'll
> > remove whatever you
> > > wish.
> > >
> > > Lastly, I know the design of Haikuware lacks in
> > function, speed, and
> > > aesthetics (compared to BeBits). Once I'm done with
> > all the files,
> > > I'll be re-designing the website and hope to have it
> > ready for the
> > > Alpha 1 release. I'm looking at an RoR design
> > perhaps. Something that
> > > will be able to stand a huge database and lots of
> > traffic. I'm also
> > > looking to create a unique website that will combine
> > the best parts of
> > > VersionTracker, BeBits, Download.com, etc.
> > Therefore, if anyone can
> > > recommend a good developer/team or has any
> > suggestions I'd be
> > > greatful. Also, if anyone here thinks they may be up
> > to this task (I'd
> > > like to keep the work in the community if possible),
> > contact me
> > > privately with your resume. It has to be someone
> > with serious
> > > credentials (not a Joomla hacker like me) with 6-8
> > weeks of full-time
> > > labour. A full proposal is in the works, and will
> > probably be 20-30
> > > pages. Ask for my budget - serious enquiries only
> > please.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Karl vom Dorff
> > > B.Sc (Hons) Biology, (German minor)
> > >
> > > http://www.karlvd.com
> > > http://www.clubloreley.org
> > > http://www.haikuware.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Oliver,
> >
> > http://urnenfeld.blogspot.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Karl vom Dorff
> > B.Sc (Hons) Biology, (German minor)
> >
> > http://www.karlvd.com
> > http://www.clubloreley.org
> > http://www.haikuware.com
> >
> >
>
>
>
--
Karl vom Dorff
B.Sc (Hons) Biology, (German minor)
http://www.karlvd.com
http://www.clubloreley.org
http://www.haikuware.com
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Dennis d'Entremont
- References:
- [openbeos] Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Arnold
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - . Meanwhile .
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Zenja Solaja
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cyan
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - . Meanwhile .
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Ryan Leavengood
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - . Meanwhile .
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cyan
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Gabriele Biffi
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Gabriele Biffi
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cian Duffy
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Matt Madia
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cyan
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Stephan Assmus
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Ramshankar
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Richie Nyhus
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Stephan Assmus
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Schrijvers Luc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Matt Madia
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cyan
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Stephan Assmus
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Matt Madia
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Urias McCullough
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - scott mc
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Dennis d'Entremont
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Cyan
- » [openbeos] Re: Site Audit - Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Dennis d'Entremont
- [openbeos] Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Oliver Ruiz Dorantes
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Karl vom Dorff
- [openbeos] Re: Site Audit
- From: Schrijvers Luc