[openbeos] Re: SCM (and p4 vs svn, comparison)
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 01:43:11 +0100 CET
Waldemar Kornewald <Waldemar.Kornewald@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Subversion is very nice! Let's use it. It has its flaws, but it seems
> to
> fit our needs better than p4 (if you ask me).
> Vote svn for president! ;)
Should we have a look at Berlios for serving the repository for us,
then? They seem to be able to host SVN repositories, and at least their
site is blazingly fast compared to SF. They also seem to have pretty
much the same services as SF, although they would even allow root file
access to CVS repositories as well.
Bye,
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: SCM (and p4 vs svn, comparison)
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: SCM (and p4 vs svn, comparison)
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM (and p4 vs svn, comparison)
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM (and p4 vs svn, comparison)
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM (and p4 vs svn, comparison)
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM (and p4 vs svn, comparison)
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM (and p4 vs svn, comparison)
- [openbeos] Re: SCM (and p4 vs svn, comparison)
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
- [openbeos] Re: SCM (and p4 vs svn, comparison)
- From: Waldemar Kornewald