[openbeos] Re: SCM
- From: Waldemar Kornewald <Waldemar.Kornewald@xxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 11:05:41 +0100
Hi,
please post your SCM1 vs SCM2 comparisons. Then, we can vote for one
that will be used for R1+.
At some later point we might write our own SCM that is more
user-oriented (GUI, userland FS?, Tracker add-on freezes state, anyway...).
Our current solutions seem to be:
1. Perforce
2. arch
3. subversion
This can be a starting point:
Perforce:
+ easy to use
+ Inter-File Branching (TM)
- closed source
+ atomic
?+ GUI (BeOS, too?): better for doc-team and starters
- files are read-only, must "p4 edit" to make writable
arch:
- complicated (ATM?)
+ open source
+ decentralized
+ atomic
+ already ported
subversion:
+ not much new to learn (just a better CVS)
+ open source
+ already ported
+ atomic
Well, it seems that subversion won the race. ;)
I read some tutorials and it seems to be comparable to p4, sometimes
better, sometimes not.
Probably, subversion is our friend for a temporary change until we get
our own super-scm. Maybe we could use a public svn service instead of
messing with our own.
Bye,
Waldemar
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: SCM
- From: Mikael Jansson (mailing lists)
- References:
- [openbeos] SCM
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
- [openbeos] Re: SCM
- From: Matthijs Hollemans
- [openbeos] Re: SCM
- From: Michael Phipps
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] SCM
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM
- » [openbeos] Re: SCM
- [openbeos] Re: SCM
- From: Mikael Jansson (mailing lists)
- [openbeos] SCM
- From: Waldemar Kornewald
- [openbeos] Re: SCM
- From: Matthijs Hollemans
- [openbeos] Re: SCM
- From: Michael Phipps