>Without knowing the issue on the Palm deal, what I'd suggest is we can >work first on things that we know we will have to strip anyway. >I think mainly about the bootloader, I heard that it was licenced. >I still don't know why they didn't stick to LILO... (maybe to be able to >boot from a windows partition...) > Back in R3 days there had been an outcry from the GPL crowd (bigger than the one with lib_eletric_fence a few months ago) with Be using some modified LILO code without having given back the source. I think (could be very wrong, seems so faaar now) that's when they decided to come up with their own boot code. Incidentally, already back then it had triggered incompatibility issues (I was not able to boot my K6 w/o a floppy until the R4 release I think) so it goes to show that this silly IBM/PC legacy is a non trivial thing to cope with. -- http://cdegea.free.fr/ | BeDev E-16870 "God exists, and she loves Bill" -- BMessage