[openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- From: "Helmar Rudolph" <helmar@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:00:21 +0200
> where is this proposal?
On my hard disk.
> where can read about it.
Nowhere at present, because it merely deals with basic strategic
matters of code maintenance, rights and obligations.
> How likely is it that Palm will go ahead with it (the proposal)?
Ask Palm. My answer: very unlikely if the BeOS community doesn't
get its act together and stands united.
> Who signed up on this project?
Donovan Schultheis (BeUnited)
John Tegen (Omicronsoft)
Jean-Michel Batto (developer)
Sean Heber (BeBits)
Scott Bates (FrizBe)
Cale Lewis (i-bug)
Jace Cavacini (BeWine)
Ryan Abrams (BeGroovy)
Rich Kosiba (BeFaqs)
Plus _many_ others who have offered their support in one way or
another, among them many developers
Waiting for final answer from:
Bernd Korz (insideBeOS, Germany)
> If you posted it somewhere obvious and I should have seen it,
> call me blind.
I deliberately kept it under wraps.
Helmar
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- From: Yuri Titov
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- From: Helmar Rudolph
- [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- From: Yuri Titov
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- » [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- From: Yuri Titov
- [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- From: Helmar Rudolph
- [openbeos] Re: Re[2]: OpenBeOS in competition with BeOS
- From: Yuri Titov