I agree wholeheartedly. We're an opensource project; our docs should be open, too. It lets the (ex)Be engineers see what we're up to and point out what we're doing wrong. ;) e Michael Phipps wrote: > > Thanks - I wrote those. :-) > > I don't mind keeping them open - if someone wants to read and understand > the code without signing up, all the power in the world to them. > > I wouldn't be leary - the way I see it, if I feel good enough about submitting > for review by team members, anyone should be able to see it. > > Anyone feel differently? > > >Hey Michael... > > > >I've been looking thru the kernel_kit downloaded via anonymous CVS. I > >noticed some text files in the 'docs' directory. Actually, it's pretty > >cool to see these -- nice to know that someone is documenting the > >calls. > > > >However... shouldn't these be hidden from the average joe? Both the > >'docs' and 'test' folders are meant to contain working files that are > >still "in-progress". Don't we want to protect them from being accessed > >by anyone? I think programmers are going to be leary of checking in > >stuff otherwise. Only the 'source' folder, which contains the final, > >"good" version should be viewable by all. The rest should require a > >password. > > > >