[openbeos] Re: Problems building today?

  • From: "Jonathon Freeman" <j_freeman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 11:27:38 -0600

I gave a shot at building this morning, without updating the tree or doing
anything else, and it built fine. Very strange.


Regards,

Jonathon 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ingo Weinhold
> Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 6:14 PM
> To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [openbeos] Re: Problems building today?
> 
> 
> On 2007-02-18 at 23:52:46 [+0100], Jonathon Freeman 
> <j_freeman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > I noticed earlier today that my automated builds on 
> HaikuHost started 
> > failing. The last successful build was at 18-Feb-2007 00:26:36 GMT. 
> > I've tried to build manually with no luck. Attached is the 
> jam log of 
> > my most recent attempt.
> > 
> > Any ideas whatsoever would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> The bfs_shell part of the build system is deliberately broken 
> to the extend that it should work again. In case of the 
> Volume.cpp which fails to compile according to your log, the 
> build system uses a good deal of target platform (aka Haiku) 
> headers although the file is compiled for the host platform 
> (apparently a RedHat Linux in your case). This deserves to be 
> fixed, but this is another story... (*)
> 
> The problem here is simply that a GCC 3.4.6 for target 
> i386-redhat-linux is configured as Haiku cross-compiler, 
> which simply won't work (although ironically, it actually 
> looks a bit more correct in this context). Please have a look 
> at the ReadMe.cross-compile in the trunk's root directory how 
> to configure the build system for cross-compilation.
> 
> CU, Ingo
> 
> (*) As I see it, fixing the fs_shell/bfs_shell build would 
> involve 1) using the headers/build headers instead of the 
> Haiku headers (porting them where necessary), 2) adjusting 
> the fs_shell accordingly, and 3) and most importantly using a 
> modified version of the BFS code.
> 
> 


Other related posts: