[openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: ar1000@xxxxxxx
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:42:15 -0500
On Feb 24, 2007, at 8:36 PM, Thomas Winwood wrote:
Jorge G. Mare (a.k.a. Koki) wrote:
I (personally) think that the major problem that we have in
addressing these issues is that we don't have an active Usability
& Design team. Such a team could create mockups to make a
compelling case that would help find us exactly what the UI should
exactly look like; that would also help reach some some real
consensus in this area.
Perhaps this could be a good opportunity for those individuals who
have an interest and the skills in this area to join forces and
make this happen. Maybe Thomas wants to be the one to take the
initiative?
I'd be happy to help out and start up a UI think-tank. I think we
may need to start up a new mailing list, since the openbeos-cdt one
seems somewhat defunct - I don't even know if I'm part of it at the
moment!
I agree — a UI team or "Meta-team"/ML is a good idea. "haiku-ui"
sounds good.
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: Urias McCullough
- [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: Jorge G. Mare (a.k.a. Koki)
- [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: Thomas Winwood
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
Jorge G. Mare (a.k.a. Koki) wrote:
I (personally) think that the major problem that we have in addressing these issues is that we don't have an active Usability & Design team. Such a team could create mockups to make a compelling case that would help find us exactly what the UI should exactly look like; that would also help reach some some real consensus in this area. Perhaps this could be a good opportunity for those individuals who have an interest and the skills in this area to join forces and make this happen. Maybe Thomas wants to be the one to take the initiative?
I'd be happy to help out and start up a UI think-tank. I think we may need to start up a new mailing list, since the openbeos-cdt one seems somewhat defunct - I don't even know if I'm part of it at the moment!
- [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: Urias McCullough
- [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: Jorge G. Mare (a.k.a. Koki)
- [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: Thomas Winwood