[openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: "Urias McCullough" <umccullough@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:59:26 -0800
On 2/24/07, Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2007-02-24 at 21:06:39 [+0100], Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> "François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I think the way it's done in Zeta makes it unintrusive enough you can
> > just forget about it if you don't like themes, yet powerful enough
> > you
> > can customize enough to feel at home.
>
> I don't think we'll need theming for R1, so take your time :-)
The truth is, we don't even know whether we need (i.e. want) theming at
all.
CU, Ingo
I suspect the communication on this topic is a little confusing for everyone
else.
What Thomas was trying to do was provide an improvement to the default Haiku
decorator (since it's clearly inspired by R5 currently - the assumption is
that it will continue to be so) - and it is needed. The flat appearance of
the close/resize buttons on Haiku window titles currently make it appear
unfinished.
So, he submits a patch, which is regarded as an improvement by several - and
it even gets committed - but to a non-default decorator (allegedly the "R5
decorator"). Now it appears that there is no desire to have multiple
decorators included with Haiku. It leaves people wondering: What is the
plan for the default decorator? Are improvements planned? Will there be an
optional R5 decorator? Is there even a "Creative Design Team" any longer
that works on this and makes these decisions?
Anyhow, the multi-decorator thing isn't really a critical issue for me - but
I don't like to see frustration amongst newcomers who wish to improve Haiku.
Also, as Haiku is getting a lot of press now, it might be a good opportunity
to freshen the look a bit more and start establishing the visual identity
that Haiku intends to portray for R1.
- Urias
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: Jorge G. Mare (a.k.a. Koki)
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- » [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
On 2007-02-24 at 21:06:39 [+0100], Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think the way it's done in Zeta makes it unintrusive enough you can > > just forget about it if you don't like themes, yet powerful enough > > you > > can customize enough to feel at home. > > I don't think we'll need theming for R1, so take your time :-) The truth is, we don't even know whether we need (i.e. want) theming at all. CU, Ingo
- [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: Jorge G. Mare (a.k.a. Koki)
- [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [openbeos] Re: Patch: Prettifying the default decorator
- From: Ingo Weinhold