[openbeos] Re: PartitionManager for DriveSetup: why not use Parted?
- From: "Brian Matzon" <brian@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 23:51:03 +0200
> Also it hasn't been proved that BFS can't be dinamically resized. At
> least it is possible to do that if it would not mean changing the block
> size. It is only that no one coded a tool to do that yet.
Theoretically, Why would changing block sizes have anything to say,
except that A LOT of restructuring would have to occur...
not that I am any fs wizard - but in theory, it should be possible
to do whatever one wants to do to it, as long as it isn't mounted.
- "In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice..."
(forgot where I got the qoute from..)
/Brian Matzon
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: PartitionManager for DriveSetup: why not use Parted?
- From: Bruno G. Albuquerque
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] PartitionManager for DriveSetup: why not use Parted?
- » [openbeos] Re: PartitionManager for DriveSetup: why not use Parted?
- » [openbeos] Re: PartitionManager for DriveSetup: why not use Parted?
- » [openbeos] Re: PartitionManager for DriveSetup: why not use Parted?
- » [openbeos] Re: PartitionManager for DriveSetup: why not use Parted?
- » [openbeos] Re: PartitionManager for DriveSetup: why not use Parted?
- » [openbeos] Re: PartitionManager for DriveSetup: why not use Parted?
- » [openbeos] Re: PartitionManager for DriveSetup: why not use Parted?
- » [openbeos] Re: PartitionManager for DriveSetup: why not use Parted?
- » [openbeos] Re: PartitionManager for DriveSetup: why not use Parted?
- » [openbeos] Re: PartitionManager for DriveSetup: why not use Parted?
- » [openbeos] Re: PartitionManager for DriveSetup: why not use Parted?
- [openbeos] Re: PartitionManager for DriveSetup: why not use Parted?
- From: Bruno G. Albuquerque