[openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- From: alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Alan Ellis)
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:00:33 -0800
Yes, more or less.
Reentrant code is code which can be 're-entered' by the execution path
safely. Be it in different threads, or the same thread.
I probably should not have used that word as it has confused the issue.
The real issue is thread safety.
=)
Alan
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:51:58PM -0500, Scott MacMaster wrote:
> > I think there may be a confusion here between "reentrant" and
> > "thread-safe". IIRC, reentrant functions produce the same result each
> > time they are called with identical arguments (e.g. sqrt(8)). strtok
> > is an example of a non-reentrant function (look at it's definition to
> > see why). Thread-safe functions are functions which can be called
> > from several threads simultaneously. IMHO, all the BeOS library
> > functions should be thread-safe, although many may not be re-entrant.
>
> I researched what reentrant meant after it was mentioned yesterday. I read
> that reentrant functions are functions that neither use static data nor
> return pointer to static data. In addition, a reentrant functions does not
> have to be thread-safe but a non-reentrant function is not thread-safe. The
> definition I read didn't say that a reentrant function has to return the
> same thing each time it's called with the same parameters.
>
> Is what I read correct?
> http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/aix/aixprggd/genprogc/writing_reentrant_thread_
> safe_code.htm
>
>
>
> Scott MacMaster
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.427 / Virus Database: 240 - Release Date: 12/6/2002
>
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: Waiting and waiting
- From: Alan Ellis
- [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- From: Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler
- [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- From: argent
- [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- From: Scott MacMaster
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- [openbeos] Re: Waiting and waiting
- From: Alan Ellis
- [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- From: Axel =?iso-8859-1?q?D=F6rfler
- [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- From: argent
- [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- From: Scott MacMaster