[openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- From: Scott Mansfield <thephantom@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 07:43:43 -0800
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 07:31, you wrote:
> > On Tuesday 10 December 2002 11:51, you wrote:
> > > The definition I read didn't say that a reentrant function has to
> > > return
> > > the same thing each time it's called with the same parameters.
> >
> > That would be "idempotent," not re-entrant.
>
> A function f: X -> X is called idempotent, if f * f = f. The above
> definition matches something like stateless deterministic, I would say.
Same for f: D -> D, it is idempotent if f(f x) = f x for all x in D? Sorry,
it's been a while and my calculus is a bit hazy. :-)
I was referring to the jargon commonly used to describe an idempotent function
as that which performs some action exactly once (initialization, for
example), even if called multiple times.
Hasta,
Scott
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- » [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [openbeos] Re: POSIX thread safety, was: Re: Waiting and waiting
- From: Ingo Weinhold