[openbeos] Re: PE vs ELF file-format
- From: Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 18:45:41 +0200
On 2003-08-21 at 18:31:13 [+0200], Matthijs Hollemans wrote:
> > Do anybody know which are the (dis)advantages of PE-files
> > and the (dis)advantages of ELF-files?
>
> This was extensively debated on the original BeDevTalk lists. I don't know
> if the archives for that list are still available.
>
> After R3 came out with a PE compiler (the same format that Windows uses),
> many developers requested that Be switch to the ELF format and consequently,
> the gcc compiler. They finally gave in ;-) I think there is an old Be
> newsletter about this debate and the decision.
Unfortunately they didn't switch to GCC on PPC as well.
> The PPC version of BeOS does not use the PE format, though, but PEF. This is
> a proprietary format from Apple, or at least it used to be (they may have
> opened it up since then, I don't know).
I think, it is reasonably well documented. When I implemented the resources
support for PEF files (more than a year ago), I got it from Apple's web site.
I read only the things of interest for me, but it looks complete.
CU, Ingo
- References:
- [openbeos] PE vs ELF file-format
- From: theUser BL
- [openbeos] Re: PE vs ELF file-format
- From: Matthijs Hollemans
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] PE vs ELF file-format
- » [openbeos] Re: PE vs ELF file-format
- » [openbeos] Re: PE vs ELF file-format
- » [openbeos] Re: PE vs ELF file-format
- » [openbeos] Re: PE vs ELF file-format
- [openbeos] PE vs ELF file-format
- From: theUser BL
- [openbeos] Re: PE vs ELF file-format
- From: Matthijs Hollemans