[openbeos] Re: Organizational question

Axel Dörfler wrote: 
Arch isn't very complicated to use, it's crude. That might seem
identical, but it isn't. It is true that the comments for arch seem
difficult, or to explicit. However, all commands are consistent and
understandable. As soon as you get into the workflow, you will know
the proper commands for everyday use, and it will be easy enough to
collect other information from the reference for more specialised
tasks.


I read a short introduction to arch as well, and I think it's way to complicated to create a patch and to submit it. IMO let's rather wait for a later version or branch of it before thinking to adopt it; it's a bit too simple in what it does now.

Yes, let's branch and create something similar to 'darcs', but with better tagging and branching support (or tell the arch team to look at darcs and make arch easier to use).

Bye,
Waldemar


Other related posts: