[openbeos] Re: OpenBFS and Zeta

On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 22:17:08 -0300 EST
"Bruno G. Albuquerque" <bga@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 17:34:45 -0500, Francis Parsons said:
> 
> > Sorry if my reading this was imagined, I'm not trying to troll 
> > here.  However, it is still a good question to ask: I presume 
> > YellowTab 
> > *has* tested Zeta with OpenBFS, but does anyone on the OpenBFS team 
> > or 
> > elsewhere have firsthand knowledge of what they found? If Zeta 
> > becomes 
> > popular even just in the BeOS community, it would not be a good thing 
> > for 
> > an incompatibility to exist between OpenBFS and Zeta, and it would be 
> > important for such a problem to be fixed as early as possible.
> 
> Zeta is BeOS. AFAIK, they did not change anything on the VFS layer. So 
> OpenBFS will work with it. Point is, OpenBFS is not complete yet. There 
> is at least one major bug that must be fixed.


Like the boot bug with "couldn't find fs shell" ??
(when used as the bfs replacement.)


> 
> > YellowTab obviously has access to OpenBFS, but do any members of the 
> > OpenBFS team have access to Zeta?
> 
> No.
> 
> > Even if we know OpenBFS does work with Dano, it would be even better 
> > to 
> > know that it's verified to work with Zeta 
> 
> See above.
> 
> > - since it's not Dano ;-)
> 
> See previous email.
> 
> -Bruno
> 
> 
> --
> Fortune Cookie Says:
> 
> Every word is like an unnecessary stain on silence and nothingness.
>               -- Beckett
>

Other related posts: