[openbeos] Re: OpenBFS R5
- From: "Urias McCullough" <umccullough@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 17:33:03 -0700
On 5/23/07, Luke Fowler <luke.fowler@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Um, Unless Haiku is lots closer to a release than it looks, it would be nice
to keep it. Mainly since the only "legit" BeOS version you can get anymore
is Max v4.
But it is possible I misunderstand the implications. :-)
I believe you did misunderstand.
IIRC, the OpenBFS under R5 option was a way to test/use Haiku's BFS
implemention under R5 before Haiku's was complete enough to use it.
OpenBFS was one of the first components of Haiku to hit Alpha/Beta
status, and therefore it needed to be tested in R5 as Haiku's kernel
wasn't even bootable at that point.
I think Axel is looking to drop the ability to compile and use OpenBFS
in R5 as it's mostly unnecessary now.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: OpenBFS R5
- From: Axel Dörfler
- References:
- [openbeos] OpenBFS R5
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [openbeos] Re: OpenBFS R5
- From: Luke Fowler
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] OpenBFS R5
- » [openbeos] Re: OpenBFS R5
- » [openbeos] Re: OpenBFS R5
- » [openbeos] Re: OpenBFS R5
- » [openbeos] Re: OpenBFS R5
Um, Unless Haiku is lots closer to a release than it looks, it would be nice to keep it. Mainly since the only "legit" BeOS version you can get anymore is Max v4. But it is possible I misunderstand the implications. :-)
- [openbeos] Re: OpenBFS R5
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [openbeos] OpenBFS R5
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [openbeos] Re: OpenBFS R5
- From: Luke Fowler