[openbeos] Re: Newsletter -- device filesystem article.
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 18:03:42 +0100 CET
Eike Dehling <e.e.dehling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I do like the idea of devices being in /dev! but in a different way
> than is
> common now. The / filesystem should completely be a virtual
> filesystem,
> only meant to mount other (virtual) filesystems in. so one could
> mount a
> harddisk, a virtual device driver filesystem, a device, or the famous
> /proc. So the / would only be the root directory, in which hardware
> or
> ...
That's *exactly* how it is done today.
> some 5 hard disks:
> /dev/mass_storage/harddisk/0
> /dev/mass_storage/harddisk/...
> /dev/mass_storage/harddisk/4
>
> the mouse, drawing-tablet, scanner and digital camera:
> /dev/graphics_input/scanner/0
> /dev/graphics_input/camera/0
> /dev/graphics_input/pointers/0
> /dev/graphics_input/pointers/1
And that's again almost exactly how it is done in BeOS.
> Now with this layout you don't have to ask anyone which devices give
> you
> what output; you can have a device in any catgory you need it. so you
> could
> put the camera in /dev/output_format/jpeg/0 and your (open)BFS
> filesystem
> is in /dev/output_format/bfs/0 :)
That won't work, and would only be usable by shell users anyway; which
harddrive is that BFS thing referring to? Where would it safe its data,
etc. It just doesn't make any sense to me.
Adios...
Axel.
- References:
- [openbeos] Newsletter -- device filesystem article.
- From: Eike Dehling
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Newsletter -- device filesystem article.
- » [openbeos] Re: Newsletter -- device filesystem article.
- » [openbeos] Re: Newsletter -- device filesystem article.
- » [openbeos] Re: Newsletter -- device filesystem article.
- [openbeos] Newsletter -- device filesystem article.
- From: Eike Dehling