[openbeos] Re: License
- From: Adi Oanca <e2joseph@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 01:39:01 +0200
Michael Phipps wrote:
I find the wording particularly interesting. What do you mean by "secure"? I
would guess probably not the computer security meaning. The usual complaint
that people have about MIT/BSD (with respect to GPL) is that people might
come along and "steal" our code and use it in a commerical product. Is this
your concern?
Yeees! I want to help a friend to implement a large distributed
system! And what better way than relying on a modified
BHandler/BLooper/BMessage/BMessenger
architecture? It's PERFECT!
If it is, let me state clearly: "Let Them!".
Yeeeeees, LET them! :-)
Adi.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: License
- From: Bruno van Dooren
- References:
- [openbeos] License
- From: Mattia Tristo
- [openbeos] Re: License
- From: Michael Phipps
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] License
- » [openbeos] Re: License
- » [openbeos] Re: License
- » [openbeos] Re: License
- » [openbeos] Re: License
- » [openbeos] Re: License
- » [openbeos] Re: License
- [openbeos] Re: License
- From: Bruno van Dooren
- [openbeos] License
- From: Mattia Tristo
- [openbeos] Re: License
- From: Michael Phipps