[openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- From: "Andre' F. Braga" <meianoite@xxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 22:02:22 -0300
Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> How portable is your code=3F I would ask for a moratorium on assembler,
> or at least a fallback to plain C, so that it can be ported to PowerPC.
> For me, at least, and I think for a lot of others, this is very
> important.
> -Nathan
I've been really silent (in fact, just plain mute) since I joined the
list, so here I go for the first time: I could't agree more. I'd really
love to se an incarnation of BeOS running on stock G3/4/5 PPC machines,
and even perfoming better on my aged Performa 6360.
Nathan, I'm 101% behind you.
Cheers, happy New Year!
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- From: Nathan Whitehorn
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- From: Nathan Whitehorn