[openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- From: "Manuel Jesus Petit de Gabriel" <freston@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 12:07:49 -0800
> You notice that I, at least, explicitly stated that it would be a *
> kernel-space* module, just a kernel addon, not compiled into tthe
> kernel itself.
Yes, I know. And I agree with it. All this fuss was because some
claims about fork() being possible to implement in userland without
any kernel assistance.
manuel,
> -Nathan
>
> --
> Fortune Cookie Says:
>
> Experience varies directly with equipment ruined.
>
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- From: Nathan Whitehorn
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- » [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- [openbeos] Re: Kernel status (POSIX)
- From: Nathan Whitehorn