[openbeos] Re: Java
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:38:11 +0100 (MET)
Bryan Varner <bryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > It doesn't make much sense to continue working on the old version,
> > when that one is not open source.
> Unless newer versions of the tree rely on language features / API's
> from the previous release in order to build. This is highly likely,
> and I won't be able to tell until I have a chance to look at the 1.6
> tree.
>
> The sad fact is, that chances are good we'll need a baseline
> 'working' 1.5 before we get 1.6 going. Granted, we won't need all the
> class libraries, just enough to get javac, javah, etc. going.
I still don't really understand; I mean even if this is the case, we
would need to update our C implementation of javah anyway, won't we?
It's probably in Sun's own interest to solve this chicken-and-egg
problem, anyway.
Bye,
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: Java
- From: Bryan Varner
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: Java
- From: Bryan Varner
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- [openbeos] Re: Java
- From: Bryan Varner
- [openbeos] Re: Java
- From: Bryan Varner