[openbeos] Re: Java
- From: Bryan Varner <bryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:23:42 -0500
It doesn't make much sense to continue working on the old version,
when
that one is not open source.
Unless newer versions of the tree rely on language features / API's
from the previous release in order to build. This is highly likely,
and I won't be able to tell until I have a chance to look at the 1.6
tree.
The sad fact is, that chances are good we'll need a baseline
'working' 1.5 before we get 1.6 going. Granted, we won't need all the
class libraries, just enough to get javac, javah, etc. going.
Bye,
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: Java
- From: Axel Dörfler
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: Java
- From: Axel Dörfler
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
- » [openbeos] Re: Java
that one is not open source.
Bye, Axel.
- [openbeos] Re: Java
- From: Axel Dörfler
- [openbeos] Re: Java
- From: Axel Dörfler