>Ok. I'll be clear from the start so there's no arguments later. > >I'm prepared to open source the BeOS kernel driver and any userland stuff >related to BeOS only. The rest of our OS including the network stack would >be >closed source. I'm uncertain about the ELF loader. If we developed it >exclusively and it was required for other closed source sections to our OS, >I'd >keep the ELF loader closed. > <snip> >We could stand to gain from having an alternative GUI implmentation from our >own. Doing a GUI is a major effort, and we've been encouraged time & again >to >seek open source solutions if possible. This is one such exploration. > >Peter Now that I understand what you propose, I agree with you and Michael. Both sides appear to have a fair amount to lose when compared to what would be gained. You've got my support. :) --DarkWyrm