[openbeos] Re: GCC headers in headers/posix
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 10:07:46 +0100 CET
Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2005-11-08 at 18:38:37 [+0100], Jérôme Duval wrote:
> > Selon Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> [...]
> > BTW is the src/system/libroot/posix/glibc/libio/_G_config.h header
> > meant to
> > be the same as headers/glibc/_G_config.h ?
> > I would guess it is (There Can Be Only One).
> The public header is basically just a hacked copy of the other one
> (removing
> dependencies to other glibc headers). The problem is, that
> _G_config.h is
> included from public headers, so it must live in a public place (just
> as in
> BeOS). Recent glibc versions come with a whole bunch of public
> headers
> ("bits/...", "arch/..."). It's almost a bit surprising that things
> work the
> way we use them, but it's probably thanks to the fact that we
> basically only
> use the libio part of glibc.
If we could remove the dependents to _G_config.h in public headers
would be nice, too.
The only thing I wouldn't want to touch are GCC private headers, though
- I wouldn't mind "fixing" libstdc++ headers.
Bye,
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Deskbar applications confusion
- From: Chris Peel
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: GCC headers in headers/posix
- From: Ingo Weinhold
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] GCC headers in headers/posix
- » [openbeos] Re: GCC headers in headers/posix
- » [openbeos] Re: GCC headers in headers/posix
- » [openbeos] Re: GCC headers in headers/posix
- » [openbeos] Re: GCC headers in headers/posix
- [openbeos] Deskbar applications confusion
- From: Chris Peel
- [openbeos] Re: GCC headers in headers/posix
- From: Ingo Weinhold