[openbeos] Re: Do we want to recreate SoftwareValet/PackageBuilder?
- From: DarkWyrm <darkwyrm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 09:26:07 -0400
Being able to support SV packages would be a good thing, I think, if you
consider the number of them on BeBits that are available. mphipps has
had the intention of us going to something more like OS X app bundles,
but I think that there should be a packaging system which handles some
of the limitations of that system (like add-ons and shared libraries) in
addition to using them. IOW, I think it's a good idea to be able to
support the packages, but not recreate SoftwareValet in its entirety.
--DarkWyrm
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: Do we want to recreate SoftwareValet/PackageBuilder?
- From: Axel Dörfler
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Do we want to recreate SoftwareValet/PackageBuilder?
- » [openbeos] Re: Do we want to recreate SoftwareValet/PackageBuilder?
- » [openbeos] Re: Do we want to recreate SoftwareValet/PackageBuilder?
- » [openbeos] Re: Do we want to recreate SoftwareValet/PackageBuilder?
- » [openbeos] Re: Do we want to recreate SoftwareValet/PackageBuilder?
- » [openbeos] Re: Do we want to recreate SoftwareValet/PackageBuilder?
- » [openbeos] Re: Do we want to recreate SoftwareValet/PackageBuilder?
- » [openbeos] Re: Do we want to recreate SoftwareValet/PackageBuilder?
- » [openbeos] Re: Do we want to recreate SoftwareValet/PackageBuilder?
- » [openbeos] Re: Do we want to recreate SoftwareValet/PackageBuilder?
- [openbeos] Re: Do we want to recreate SoftwareValet/PackageBuilder?
- From: Axel Dörfler