[openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- From: "Paul \"Bo\" Peaslee" <h2oman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 11:03:53 -0400
Michael:
I've been trying to ignore this thread for the last couple of days. The
only reason I tuned back in was to find out why it hadn't died. Glad I did.
I'd never have heard your threat (promise) to close it down. I think the
best we can do is ignore it. When these folks learn that no one is paying
any attention perhaps they'll stop.
Starting a new list is not the answer. Resources are already strained. All
our resources should be devoted to development rather than policing a list.
I'm new to BeOS and I'm still getting something from this. The list is
still a great thing. Let's just get on with business and stop giving these
folks more time than we should.
Bo
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- From: Michael Phipps
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- From: Michael Phipps