[openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- From: Linus Almstrom <linalm-7@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 23:27:25 +0200
I feel exactly the same.
It was fun in the beginning, but then new mailinglists were spawned
and why this mailinglist still exists is still confusing to me.
Seldom have I read anything of importance the past two months (or three,
four months..)
ba bye.
Regards
/Procton
On 2002-08-24 at 06:32:36 [+0200], openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Wow. This list sure has degenerated into a bunch of shit. Quite a
> contrast from its early days when it was the hotbed of discussion for the
> project. Nowadays, I get dozens of emails everyday from this list and
> hardly any are even worth a first read, let alone keeping.
>
> I am now signing off this mailing list. It has become hijacked by a bunch
> of people with nothing useful to say about OpenBeOS (or anything else for
> that matter. Sayonarra.
>
>
> >> Try slaving away at
> >> a sweat shop. The poor work for as long as 12 hours w/ few breaks
> making
> >> your clothes and picking your food. Who makes the food, rich people?
> They
> >> don't pick nor prepare food.
> [mountains of stupid garbage snipped...]
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- From: Rob Tijssen
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- From: Daniel Reinhold
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- From: Rob Tijssen
- [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- From: Daniel Reinhold