[openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- From: Lunar <lunar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 20:03:30 +0200
On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 12:35:33PM -0400, Fred K Ollinger wrote:
> > 2) The simple truth is, that you buy greater potential for profit with
> > a higher risk. You can as well gain 100% in a week via high leverage
> > instruments like options or futures, but you can easily lose your
> > complete investment and for the latter even more than that. Don't throw
> > numbers around when you can't even estimate the risks involved.
>
> But over the long-term, taking more risks will lose more than you will
> win. On the flip-side, if you are safer, in the long run, you gain more.
> [...]
My 2 (euro)cents :
I don't want to see any money given by people for funding a project
being thrown in a Casino wich is also known for masking people what
their money is actualy doing : ruining people lives with mass job
cuts.
I don't like capitalism, that's why I'm involved in free software devs.
I don't want the money used to fund a free software project being used
actually to contribute to the "market".
Sorry about taht.
I have crossed on some website that criticizes PayPal, like :
http://www.paypalwarning.com/
http://www.paypalsucks.com/
Should we trust PayPal ?
Lunar
PS : Sorry, that's a bit rough for a first post, but I was so feeling
bad about what was posted...
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- From: Fred K Ollinger
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- » [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [openbeos] Re: Couple of non-sequiters
- From: Fred K Ollinger