[openbeos] Re: CVS vs. Better-than-CVS
- From: Erik Jaesler <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:48:16 -0700
It would appear subversion has been ported:
http://www.bebits.com/app/3962
e
John Morgan wrote:
While Perforce is available free of charge to many Open Source projects, I want
to point out that Subversion has many similarities to Perforce and is fully
Open Source itself.
http://subversion.tigris.org/
The main functional difference is that Subversion is designed to optimize
network traffic at the expense of keeping an extra (unmodified) copy of the
source. Although I don't know of a port to BeOS, it probably wouldn't be too
difficult to port if someone wanted to. It needs the Apache Portable Runtime
(APR) library and Berkley DB, and can be compiled with GCC.
- John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mikael Jansson (mailing lists)" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [openbeos] CVS vs. Better-than-CVS
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:28:22 GMT
Heya,
While I do realize pretty much anything is better than CVS, and most
revision control systems are pretty similar, I'm biased towards
Perforce, so here's a little comparison for those who think CVS is
"good enough", and are intimidated by a possibly switch to something
else:
http://www.perforce.com/perforce/technotes/note067.html
http://www.perforce.com/perforce/cvs.html (possibly skipping the Money
section).
--
Mikael Jansson
http://mikael.jansson.be
- References:
- [openbeos] Re: CVS vs. Better-than-CVS
- From: John Morgan
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] CVS vs. Better-than-CVS
- » [openbeos] Re: CVS vs. Better-than-CVS
- » [openbeos] Re: CVS vs. Better-than-CVS
- » [openbeos] Re: CVS vs. Better-than-CVS
While Perforce is available free of charge to many Open Source projects, I want to point out that Subversion has many similarities to Perforce and is fully Open Source itself.
http://subversion.tigris.org/
The main functional difference is that Subversion is designed to optimize network traffic at the expense of keeping an extra (unmodified) copy of the source. Although I don't know of a port to BeOS, it probably wouldn't be too difficult to port if someone wanted to. It needs the Apache Portable Runtime (APR) library and Berkley DB, and can be compiled with GCC.
- John
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mikael Jansson (mailing lists)" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [openbeos] CVS vs. Better-than-CVS Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:28:22 GMT
Heya,
While I do realize pretty much anything is better than CVS, and most revision control systems are pretty similar, I'm biased towards Perforce, so here's a little comparison for those who think CVS is "good enough", and are intimidated by a possibly switch to something else:
http://www.perforce.com/perforce/technotes/note067.html
http://www.perforce.com/perforce/cvs.html (possibly skipping the Money section).
-- Mikael Jansson http://mikael.jansson.be
- [openbeos] Re: CVS vs. Better-than-CVS
- From: John Morgan