[openbeos] Re: Bootable Test CD

  • From: "Karl vom Dorff" <karl@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:17:23 -0400

On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Matt Madia <mattmadia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> also, this should be mentioned at
> //www.freelists.org/list/haiku-development
>
> just another 0.02


So the original link to the file (above) has changed to
here<http://www.haikuware.com/view-details/development/app-installation/unofficial-pre-alpha-bootable-cd>,
(because the name has changed - as advised).

>
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Matt Madia <mattmadia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From what i recall,
> >
> >  Haiku has been particularly particular with allowing people to promote
> >  or distribute "Haiku" cd's... even when those people are representing
> >  Haiku at a public event.
> >
> >  imVHo,  using the title, "Haiku Bootable Alpha Test CD"  has two vices
> >  against it..  Using "Haiku"  and the word *everyone* has been waiting
> >  to hear:  "Alpha"
> >
> >  at least call it "Pre-Alpha"  or "Unofficial Pre-Alpha CD".
> >
> >  mmadia
> >
> >
> >
> >  On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:17 PM, Karl vom Dorff <karl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >  > Hi,
> >  >
> >  > I've submitted a bootable test CD at Haikuware and have had a lot of
> >  > comments about it. Some for, and some against.
> >  >
> >  > I take the side that the software might be good for developers who
> don't
> >  > want to bother setting up a build environment, download the entire
> source,
> >  > and then compile it and figure out why there's isn't an *.iso etc.
> They just
> >  > burn it, test it, and maybe as a result submit patches or fixes to
> Haiku.
> >  > Or, maybe users might have the same issue, and later submit bug
> reports or
> >  > add their hardware to our hardware database.
> >  >
> >  > The other side is that Haiku should release a demo CD when Haiku is
> ready
> >  > because it might give a false impression to users/critics.
> >  >
> >  > I believe I've read and understood the BSD/MIT license correctly, and
> it
> >  > says that the software can be freely distributed/altered etc. but I
> don't
> >  > want to cause any rifts. So, I'd like to know how the developers
> feel. I can
> >  > easily remove the software if suggested/required.
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >
>
>


-- 
Karl vom Dorff
B.Sc (Hons) Biology, (German minor)

http://www.karlvd.com
http://www.clubloreley.org
http://www.haikuware.com

Other related posts: