> On 12 Jan 2007, at 12:44 PM, Thom Holwerda wrote: > > >> Personally, I don't think that we should include BePDF - for a PDF > >> viewer, it's already too complex and powerful to come with the OS > >> IMO. > > > > > > Of course, a better route would be to go the Apple way by simply > > allowing > > the image viewer to read .pdf files. That way we're both happy :). > > Or, we could do it the Be way and have a "Preview" application that > can display anything for which a translator exists. :) Yes, like I said, the Apple way, but then done in such a way that anyone can provide translators :). Thom Holwerda --- Managing editor at http://www.osnews.com