[openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:07:52 +0200 CEST
Adi Oanca <adioanca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just wondering...
> Why don't we let non-project people develop post R1 APIs? We need a
> HTML kit, don't we? > An XML kit?
> a download server? etc. They already don't have anything [to do]/
> [left to be done/assigned]! > Why not harvest their power?
If "they" develop something right now, they would be part of our team,
right? :-)
And then, developing new components and APIs shouldn't be in the hands
of few people only - it takes a lot of discussion to create those and
show the path into our future; we don't have the resources right now to
do such a thing, I'd think.
IOW if someone develops something like this now, we won't stop him, but
there can't be any guaranty that we can make use of that stuff later
on, too.
If someone is willing to spend resources on our project, he should do
it now in our current scope. Anything else might be a waste of time.
Bye,
Axel.
- Follow-Ups:
- [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- From: Adi Oanca
- References:
- [openbeos] BeAPI++
- From: Adi Oanca
Other related posts:
- » [openbeos] BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- » [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- From: Ingo Weinhold
- [openbeos] Re: BeAPI++
- From: Adi Oanca
- [openbeos] BeAPI++
- From: Adi Oanca